Sunday, May 17, 2020
The Alchemist Reflection - 794 Words
The Alchemist In my point of view,the main message of this amazing story is to always follow your dreams no matter what obstacle comes between you and your dream. ââ¬Å"The alchemistâ⬠has lots of things to learn from not just that it has a variety of myths and morals but it also gives you another perspective of life.As a matter of fact, ââ¬Å"The alchemistâ⬠provides to you a journey of a young age man whos dream is to go to Egypt and find the treasure near the pyramids. Santiago a young shepherd boy which had a dream that had been following him for many days already came into a abandoned church with his herd of sheeps to rest,the boy with only a jacket and a book used them as a pillow and blanket to spend the night in the church, as he sleepsâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦Santiago providing lots of help to the merchant managed it to get more money and with that Santiago helps the man get a better way to get more customers to his crystal shop;in addition, with all his money gather heS how MoreRelatedReflection Of The Alchemist1010 Words à |à 5 PagesThe alchemist is a unique piece of literature that stays true to itââ¬â¢s message it attempts to teach you. It begins when a young shepherd, Santiago, has a dream about a treasure he is to find at the Egyptian pyramids not once but twice. With curiosity he goes about and finds a gypsy to ask for what the dreams can possibly mean to him. The gypsy says she cannot decipher what his dream could mean ,but she advises him to go to Egypt himself to learn if there is anything out for him. For that message sheRead MoreCritical Reading Reflection on the Alchemist Essay1309 Words à |à 6 PagesThe Alchemist is a story about a shepherd from Spain named Santiago whose parents have him attending a seminary to become priest and while he was there was taught to read. Santiago could be considered an educated person and achieve a much higher status than Shepard. Instead, he chose to become a Shepard since they travelled arou nd the country side while grazing their flocks of sheep. Santiagoââ¬â¢s father did not object to the traveling sheep herder idea and gave him his blessing and inheritance earlyRead MoreSummary Of The Abandoned Spanish Building Spain 1625 Words à |à 7 Pagessignificance of the caravan is the new knowledge he gains about alchemy and learning about The Alchemist. *Al-Fayoum Oasis, Sahara Desert: The significance of the Oasis is that Santiago meets the Alchemist and the love of his life. Fatima gives him something to come back to after achieving his ââ¬Å"Personal Legendâ⬠and the Alchemist leads him towards the pyramids. *Enemy Camp, Sahara Desert: When Santiago and the Alchemist were taken by warlords, Santiago had to turn himself into the wind to avoid being killedRead MoreA Brief Note On The City Of California1630 Words à |à 7 Pagesthe reflection of the tv. There was a dark strange figure moving behind us. I turned to see a man trying to look inside the house past the foggy curtains. As soon as I noticed this, I alerted my brother and we ran to my sisterââ¬â¢s room to warn her as well. We woke her, told her what was happening, and without hesitation she called 911. While she was on the phone we heard a window break which came from my parentsââ¬â¢ room, and as soon as we knew what happened â⬠¦ (Tier) Paulo Coelhoââ¬â¢s The Alchemist intelligentlyRead MoreWho Is The Villain? - Frankenstein Or The Monster?1206 Words à |à 5 Pagesauthor, Marry Shelley is one of the authors who is not straightforward about who is the villain in her novel. In Frankenstein, both the Monster and Victor Frankenstein could be considered the villains in the book. Doctor Victor Frankenstein is an alchemist who is obsessed with creating life from the dead. He creates the green creature, also given the name Frankenstein, who is portrayed as the Monster in Mary Shelleyââ¬â¢s Frankenstein. Dr. Frankensteinââ¬â¢s complete disregard for mortal beings, obsessionRead MoreThe s Bargain That Made Us Rethink Pseudoscience2233 Words à |à 9 Pagesan unfavorable assessment on alchemy which caused the practice to be banned in many countries. Many ââ¬Å"chymistsâ⬠quickly isolated themselves from alchemy but did not consider the alchemical process as fallacious (Economist 85). Why did many famo us alchemists do this? Referring back to Dr. Principe, many thought that alchemy served as a way of life rather than a process of obtaining gold. Moreover, many 16th century writers such as Shakespeare developed stories in which the characters embody these alchemicalRead MoreThe Hero : The Alchemist, And Dorothy From The Wizard Of Oz1995 Words à |à 8 Pageslives, and basically just do good deeds. Heroes follow their journey, which, when written, is actually very clichà ©. A hero follows a set of events in their journey that are rarely changed. In this essay, two heroââ¬â¢s are examined, Santiago from The Alchemist, and Dorothy from The Wizard of Oz. These two stories seem very different, but in the end, are actually very similar. When examined closely, one may find that their journeys are very similar, following the events of a heroââ¬â¢s journey. This seeminglyRead MoreDo You Know That The Alchemists In The Ancient Ages Melted1297 Words à |à 6 PagesDo you know that th e alchemists in the ancient ages melted many substances in crucibles with the hope of turning those into gold? Likewise, a challenging experience ââ¬â ââ¬Å"Crucible of Leadershipâ⬠ââ¬â can turn someone to a successful leader if he can manage it properly. The stressful and challenging experiences to serve under an extremely demanding Commanding Officer (CO), Lieutenant Colonel (LTC) Saif, is the most significant event in my life that transformed me to a committed, self-aware, and adaptiveRead MoreFrankenstein : A Whole Mess Of Things1097 Words à |à 5 PagesArguably one of the most complex characters in Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein is a whole mess of things. Victorââ¬â¢s true reason for his downfall is his thirst for knowledge, simple. He was obsessed with reading the works of ancient and outdated alchemists. Specifically, the works of Agrippa, Magnus, and Paracelsus. This, coupled with Victor experiencing a thunderstorm at 15, sparks an interest in Natural Sciences. Even though he was told that alchemy was rubbish, he still continues to study it whenRead MoreUnderstanding The Dynamics Of Emotion, Compassion, Cognition,1119 Words à |à 5 Pagestrembling contributing to the subjective experience of fear. Contrarily, the Cannon-Bard theory suggests that stimulus leads to simultaneous arousal and emotion. Schachter and Singerââ¬â¢s two-factor theory attributes emotion as a result of cognitive reflection resulting from a stimulus. On the other hand, the cognitive-mediational theory attributes emotion to the personal perceptions of sensation. Cognition and emotion theories may differ in the arrangement of cause-and-effect relationships among experience
Wednesday, May 6, 2020
Analysis Of The Book The Revolution By Jack Rakove
Revolutionaries, by Jack Rakove published in 2010 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company, which is located in New York city, New York, brings a collection of stories of the ââ¬Ëfounding fathersââ¬â¢ together to create the story of the American Revloution. The thesis of the book is arguably that the American Revolution may never have happened without the mishaps of the Boston Tea Party, which in turn created a collection of colonial leaders. Rakoveââ¬â¢s book, in the early chapters, focus on Samuel and John Adams, John Dickinson, and George Washington. The later sections talk about the trio of key party leaders in the early Republic: Jefferson, Madison, and Hamilton. Throughout, we are introduced to less commonly know people: Henry Laurens, Jack Laurens, Arthur Lee and George Mason The account of the first part of Revolutionaries is one we all learn in elementary school: ââ¬Ëno taxation without representationââ¬â¢ and the Boston Tea Party. Weââ¬â¢re too comf ortable with this period, or at least with how we know it: the characters and the events have the well-worn quality that comes from being handled too much. Benjamin Franklin with his half-glasses sells us plumbing and tax advice. Proud Sam Adams hawks beer. Rakove uses rich descriptions of the Foundersââ¬â¢ daily lives to quicken the plaster-cast heroes. While the First Continental Congress (meeting in Philadelphia in the fall of 1774) was debating how to respond to harsh British sanctions against the city of Boston, delegate George
The Recidivism of Homicide Offenders Prisoners Law
Question: Describe about The Recidivism of Homicide Offenders for Prisoners Law. Answer: Introduction Recidivism Recidivism refers to the behavior of an individual repeating an act of behaviors that are undesirable, even after experiencing the negative consequences of engaging in the behavior. Recidivism in Australian Recidivism is rampant in Australia with 42% of prisoners released during the 2011-2012 returning under sentence within 2 years. In Australia, about two in every three prisoners will have been imprisoned in the past. About one in four of Australian prisoners will be reconvicted within three months of being released from the prison. The rates of recidivism in Australian regardless of how they are measured seem reasonably consistent over time. Approximately fifty percent of Australian adults police arrestees will have been arrested at least one in the last twelve months and about one in five will have spent time in prison in the last twelve months. Between fifty and sixty percent of the Australian adults police arrestees will be rearrested at least once within ten years even though the likelihood of arrest is highest within the first 2 years. Approximately two out of three Australian adult offenders appearing before the courts of laws will have been convicted in the past and one in five sentenced to prison in the past. About 15% of the Australian adults offenders released from community corrections will go back to the community within 2 years. Reoffending in Australia climaxes in the mid to late teenage years and the likelihood of being a recidivist is highest between the ages of 21 and 17 years of age, and declines into adulthood. Rate and Comparison The Australian rate of recidivism is as high as 42% in comparison to the United States which has about 76.6% of those released getting back to prison within five years. In the United States, about two-thirds (67.8%) of people released get back to prison within three years in comparison to between 35% and 41% of the prisoners in Australia being reimprisoned within 2 years of being released. Victorias rate of return prison (39.5%) which is lower than that of Australia average. On other hand , the Northern territory has the highest rate of recidivism to prison at 51.7% while the New South Wales have proportion recidivism rate of 45.8% which is higher than Australian. The rate of Queensland has the recidivism rate of 39.5% and the Tasmania has recidivism of 39.0%. These percentages can be illustrated by the fugue one below. The percentage of prisoners freed during 2011-2012 getting back to prison within two years of release (recidivism to prison) Background Most prisons in Australia are holding prisoners who at one time committed the same offense that they are incarcerated for. One of the major reasons for the increase in recidivism is based on the fact that the Australian correction system does not have policies aimed at deterring people from committing a crime, but it reinforces the behavior of the offender. This is because the Australian correctional system does not emphasize on addressing the problems that lead to incarceration, and it places burden on the police department and the judicial system to remove offenders from the streets, as opposed to helping these offenders to become law abiding citizens (Mears, Cochran and Cullen 2015). It is because of these facts that recidivism is a problem in the criminal justice system of Australia. Furthermore, a number of social and economic factors play a role in increasing the rates of recidivism in Australia. Examples include poverty, inadequate housing facilities and inability to meet some of the basic needs of an individual. Additionally, the policies of the criminal justice system in Australia have not been efficient in reducing recidivism, because some of the policies make it difficult for the offender to get a job, once he has been released from prison (Mitchell et al 2012). Examples of such policies include suspending their driving licenses and maintaining a prior record of crime that makes it difficult for these offenders to be successfully integrated back into the community. Hence, these offenders will definitely resort back to crime. The number of prisoners in Australia who have been arrested and incarcerated for re-offending is very high. For instance, statistics indicates that 50% of prisoners, who are currently in Australian jails, have been imprisoned before (Dwyer 2016). Therefore, they are repeat prisoners. This figure is very high, when compared to the rates of recidivism in the United States. The comparison is made to the United States because; the US has some of the highest crime rates in the world. However, the rates of re-offending in the United States stands at 24.4%; this is in comparison to 50% in Australia (Dwyer 2016). In Australia, the people who are vulnerable to recidivism are young people, who are between 10 to 13 years old. Their rate of recidivism stands at 70%. This is a very high rate, and it signifies the failure of the government policies to efficiently address the problems that these children are facing (Giles 2016). These problems are social and economic problems. For instance, some of the children who are found to be committing crime are always involved in taking drugs (Lockwood, Nally, and Ho 2016). This is a social problem that is facing Australia; hence, the best method of solving the problem is to ensure that it is difficult for young people to access the drugs, and they pass through a rehabilitation program that does not focus on punishing these children, but helping them to overcome their drug addictions (Skeem et al 2014). The problems that are affecting young offenders are the same problems that affect adult offenders, resulting to the overcrowding of Australian prisons. Therefore, it is important to assert that the best strategies that can help to reduce the problem of recidivism, should center on fighting poverty and ensuring that people do not easily access drugs that are harmful to their health (Di Tella and Schargrodsky, 2013). However, these policies may not efficient if other stakeholders in the criminal justice system do not cooperate with the government. This is because reduction of poverty and regulating the social system in Australia is a function of the federal and provincial governments. On the other hand, the criminal justice system can come up with its own policies aimed at reducing the problem of recidivism in Australia There are a number of policies and factors that can help to reduce the problem of re-offending. These includes training prisoners on skills that they can use to sustain themselves, once they come out of prison, or even, if they are allowed to study while in prison (Durose, Cooper and Snyder 2014). However, these are some of the oldest methods used to rehabilitate prisoners; hence scholars suggest new methods that can complement the mentioned methods. One of the methods that has been identified, and can be efficient in solving the problem of re-offending is the use of peer mentors. For instance, the use of peer mentoring has achieved great success in countries such as Sweden and the Republic of Ireland in reducing the problem of recidivism. Under this concept of peer mentoring, there is a need of identifying ex-prisoners who are fully rehabilitated, so that they may help their peers who are in prison. They are to provide advice to their peers, on the best methods they can use to be fully integrated back into the society (Rice and Harris 2013). It is important to explain that only the person who has once served a prison sentence can understand what these other people are facing; hence, they are better suited to give a reliable advice that can help in reducing the chances of recidivism in Australia (White, Nemelka and Floyd 2015). It is important to explain that prisoners are likely to respond to the advice of their peers, as opposed to the advice of wardens and law enforcement officers. Therefore, the use of peer mentoring might be one of the most efficient methods to use in reducing the high rates of recidivism in Australia. Reformed prisoners will have a chance to contribute to the society, because of their initiatives of helping convicts to overcome crime once released. In fact, it is the use of peer mentoring that United States, one of the countries that has a high crime rate, is able to reduce the rates of re-offenders in the country. Discussion The peer mentoring system will involve the use of ex-convicts who are trained as positive role model to the young men and women who are incarcerated. Under this program, a mentor will be assigned to specific prisons and inmates for purposes of talking to them, telling them his life story, and explaining to them the importance of obeying the law, and living a positive life in the society. While providing the mentorship services, the mentor must be working under the supervision of a senior law enforcement officer, who should offer guidance and monitor the conduct of the prisoners who are being mentored (Gallagher et al 2015). Furthermore, it is important to assert that the mentorship program should cover training on self-belief, skills, motivation and focus. It is important to explain that having a positive role model is one of the best and most powerful methods of preventing re-offending. This is because a mentor is an example of success, and prisoners will identify with him, because he has also passed through the same system and he understands their fears and their vulnerabilities. However, ion as much as mentors will play an important role in determining the success of the full rehabilitation of prisoners, there are certain criteria that a mentor must meet, before he is given a chance to engage in the mentorship program. The first criteria, is that the mentor must be free from using illicit drugs (Durose and Markman 2015). Furthermore, the mentor must not be a drug addict, as drug addiction is a problem, and it is not an example of positive living. Additional, the mentor must be having a stable life, and a [positive attitude towards other people. He must also have stopped engaging in crime. It is only a mentor who has the above qualifications can manage to earn the respect of the offenders. Therefore, without the respect of these offenders, chances of a mentor achie ving success during the mentorship program are low. In a study carried out by Listwan et al (2013) in the United States, results indicate that counseling has the greatest impact in reducing cases of recidivism. For instance, in the United States, counseling sessions have the impact of reducing re-offending by 13%. This is closely followed by skill building programs, which reduced instance of recidivism by 12% and multiple coordinated services that had an impact in reducing cases of recidivism by 12%. Furthermore, it is important to assert that the mentorship sessions which were the most efficient and had positive results were group based mentorship programs (Mohammed and Mohamed 2015). From these results, it is possible to denote that the best method that the Australian department of correctional services can reduce the negative impacts of recidivism is through the use of group based mentorship programs. The correctional officers and policy formulators can learn from this study that discipline interventions did not have an impact of reducing the occurrence of recidivism. In fact, Listwan et al (2013) explains that in areas where a punitive approach was used for purposes of correcting offenders, there was an increase of instances of recidivism by 8%. Furthermore, deterrence interventions had an impact of reducing instances of recidivism by 2%. Therefore, these results provide a proof that it is easier to reduce instances of recidivism through the use of mentorship programs. This is as opposed to the use of punitive and deterrence interventions. The Australian government can learn from these studies, and carry out their own independent research and case study analysis on countries that have adopted the mentorship programs as their official policy of rehabilitating offenders, so that the government can judge whether the policy is efficient, and can be applied in Australia. Examples of solutions from Australian Literature The police operation have been evaluated in Australian in 2004 by the AIC study that examined the effectiveness of Australian Federal Police operation in the Australian Capital Territory. The outcome of this research showed that by targeting recidivist property offenders, police could potentially have a real impact in the reduction of property crime rates mainly via the incapacitation effects of incarceration. Another example relates to the evaluation of drug court undertaken in western Australian in 2003 by UWA CRC. The result showed that the drug court program did not have a significant impact in reducing the reoffending even though latest studies have illustrated that they have a positive effect. Conclusion Recidivism is a problem in Australia, and this is because 50% of incarcerated people are repeat offenders. Furthermore, young adults are the people who are most vulnerable to re-offending. There are a number of reasons that emerge, which explain the reasons for an increase of recidivism in Australia (Broadhurst et al 2016). Some of these reasons include poverty and poor social conditions. However, these are not the main reasons for an increased rate of re-offending in Australia. Furthermore, reduction of poverty and improving the social conditions of offenders and people in Australia is not within the scope of correctional service officers. This is the responsibility of the federal and provincial governments (Schmidt and Witte 2012). However, correctional officers can learn from countries such as Sweden and the United States, and develop a mentorship program, where ex-convicts will come and mentor the existing convicts. These mentorship programs are a success in these countries, and an example is the United States, where the prison mentorship programs have led to a reduction of 13% of circumstances of recidivism in the country (Davis et al 2014). However, while coming up with a prison mentorship program, caution should be taken, to ensure that only reformed prisoners are allowed to offer mentorship services. This is because they will become positive role models to their peers. On the other hand, punitive and deterrence policies do not achieve the desired results of reducing the rates of crime. In fact, these policies lead to an increase in the rates of crime. This is because convicts will still seek to engage in crime after they have left the prison. They do not have any motivating factor that will prevent them from committing crime. Recommendations For purposes of reducing the rates of recidivism in Australia, the department of correctional service should introduce mentorship programs. The department should look for reformed prisoners, who have not committed a crime, for a period of five years. The department should train these people on counseling services; hence, imparting counseling skills to them. These people should use the imparted skills, for purposes of counseling their peers in the prisons. Furthermore, to achieve efficiency through this method, the department should carry out a case study, and analyze the manner which countries such as United States and Sweden have managed to reduce the rates of re-offending, through the use of peer counselors. The government should learn from these countries and implement the policy on a wider scale in Australia. The policy should be a governmental policy, with legislations in place that will provide guidance on the manner which correctional officers should implement the policy. References Broadhurst, R., Maller, R., Maller, M. and Bouhours, B., 2016. The Recidivism of Homicide Offenders in Western Australia.Available at SSRN 2712091. Davis, L.M., Steele, J.L., Bozick, R., Williams, M., Turner, S., Miles, J.N., Saunders, J. and Steinberg, P.S., 2014. Correctional Education in the United States. Di Tella, R. and Schargrodsky, E., 2013. Criminal recidivism after prison and electronic monitoring.Journal of Political Economy,121(1), pp.28-73. Durose, M. and Markman, J., 2015. Using a Multistate Perspective To Examine Recidivism Outcomes. Durose, M.R., Cooper, A.D. and Snyder, H.N., 2014. Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 30 States in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010.Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics,28. Dwyer, V. 2016.Could Prison Mentors Reduce Australia's Sky High Recidivism Rates? | VICE | Australia. [online] VICE. Available at: https://www.vice.com/en_au/read/could-prison-mentors-reduce-australias-sky-high-recidivism-rates [Accessed 27 Oct. 2016]. Gallagher, J.R., Nordberg, A., Deranek, M.S., Ivory, E., Carlton, J. and Miller, J.W., 2015. Predicting termination from drug court and comparing recidivism patterns: Treating substance use disorders in criminal justice settings.Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly,33(1), pp.28-43. Giles, M., 2016. Study in prison reduces recidivism and welfare dependence: A case study from Western Australia 2005-2010.Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, (514), p.1. Listwan, S.J., Sullivan, C.J., Agnew, R., Cullen, F.T. and Colvin, M., 2013. The pains of imprisonment revisited: The impact of strain on inmate recidivism.Justice Quarterly,30(1), pp.144-168. Lockwood, S.K., Nally, J.M. and Ho, T., 2016. Race, Education, Employment, and Recidivism among Offenders in the United States: An Exploration of Complex Issues in the Indianapolis Metropolitan Area.International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences,11(1). Mears, D.P., Cochran, J.C. and Cullen, F.T., 2015. We are still largely in the dark as to whether incarceration reduces recidivism.USAppAmerican Politics and Policy Blog. Miller, M., Drake, E. and Nafziger, M., 2013.What works to reduce recidivism by domestic violence offenders?. Washington State Institute for Public Policy. Mitchell, O., Wilson, D.B., Eggers, A. and MacKenzie, D.L., 2012. Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional drug courts.Journal of Criminal Justice,40(1), pp.60-71. Mohammed, H. and Mohamed, W.A.W., 2015. Reducing Recidivism Rates through Vocational Education and Training.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,204, pp.272-276. Rice, M.E. and Harris, G.T., 2013. Psychopathy and violent recidivism.Handbook on psychopathy and law, pp.231-249. Schmidt, P. and Witte, A., 2012.Predicting recidivism using survival models. Springer Science Business Media. Skeem, J.L., Winter, E., Kennealy, P.J., Louden, J.E. and Tatar II, J.R., 2014. Offenders with mental illness have criminogenic needs, too: Toward recidivism reduction.Law and human behavior,38(3), p.212. White, G., Nemelka, I. and Floyd, J., 2015. Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Laws Affect on Recidivism. https://www.aic.gov.au/media_library/publications/rpp/80/rpp080.pdf
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)